And the saga continues . . . In BP West Coast Products, LLC v. Shalabi, No. C11-1341MJP, 2012 WL 441155, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Feb. 10, 2012), plaintiff filed suit against defendant alleging that defendant violated certain franchise agreements. Defendant counterclaimed,...
Our attorneys are proud to serve
Franchisees And Dealers Nationwide
Month: May 2019
Historical Review of Franchise Fees: Litigating the Franchise Fee Element in 2011
And the saga continues . . . In Roberts v. C.R. England, Inc., 827 F. Supp. 2d 1078 (N.D. Cal. 2011), independent contractors (“plaintiffs”) filed a putative class action against affiliated transportation industry companies (“defendants”) alleging, among other things,...
Historical Review of Franchise Fees: Litigating the Franchise Fee Element in 2010
And the saga continues . . . In Bye v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co., 733 F. Supp. 2d 805 (E.D. Mich. 2010), an insurance agent (“plaintiff”) brought suit against the insurer (“defendant”) alleging it violated the Michigan Franchise Investment Law (MFIL). There,...
Historical Review of Franchise Fees: Litigating the Franchise Fee Element in 2004
And the saga continues . . . In Home Pest & Termite Control, Inc. v. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, No. 8:02CV406, 2004 WL 240556, at *1 (D. Neb. Feb. 6, 2004), a trained pest control operator (“plaintiff”) filed suit against the manufacturer of a termite elimination...
Historical Review of Franchise Fees: Litigating the Franchise Fee Element in 2009
And the saga continues . . . In Coyne’s & Co. v. Enesco, LLC, 553 F.3d 1128 (8th Cir. 2009), a distributor (“plaintiff”) entered into an agreement with a company formed under the laws of England (“company”). The agreement provided for plaintiff’s exclusive right...