And the saga continues . . . In Three M Enterprises, Inc. v. Texas D.A.R. Enterprises, Inc., 368 F. Supp. 2d 450 (D. Md. 2005), defendants were unable to prevail on a motion to dismiss on its argument that plaintiff was not a “franchise” under Maryland law....
Historical Review of Franchise Fees: Litigating the Franchise Fee Element in 2005
read more